Real Food Blog » Factory Farming

Father's Day At Lehman's

Factory Farming

...now browsing by category

 

Pesticide Exposure Linked To ADHD

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Is enough being done to protect us from chemicals that could harm us? Watch “Toxic America,” a special two-night investigative report with Sanjay Gupta M.D., June 2 & 3 at 8 p.m. ET on CNN.

Children exposed to higher levels of a type of pesticide found in trace amounts on commercially grown fruit and vegetables are more likely to have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder than children with less exposure, a nationwide study suggests.

Researchers measured the levels of pesticide byproducts in the urine of 1,139 children from across the United States. Children with above-average levels of one common byproduct had roughly twice the odds of getting a diagnosis of ADHD, according to the study, which appears in the journal Pediatrics.

Exposure to the pesticides, known as organophosphates, has been linked to behavioral and cognitive problems in children in the past, but previous studies have focused on communities of farm workers and other high-risk populations. This study is the first to examine the effects of exposure in the population at large.

Organophosphates are “designed” to have toxic effects on the nervous system, says the lead author of the study, Maryse Bouchard, Ph.D., a researcher in the department of environmental and occupational health at the University of Montreal. “That’s how they kill pests.”

The pesticides act on a set of brain chemicals closely related to those involved in ADHD, Bouchard explains, “so it seems plausible that exposure to organophosphates could be associated with ADHD-like symptoms.”

Environmental Protection Agency regulations have eliminated most residential uses for the pesticides (including lawn care and termite extermination), so the largest source of exposure for children is believed to be food, especially commercially grown produce. Adults are exposed to the pesticides as well, but young children appear to be especially sensitive to them, the researchers say.

Detectable levels of pesticides are present in a large number of fruits and vegetables sold in the U.S., according to a 2008 report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture cited in the study. In a representative sample of produce tested by the agency, 28 percent of frozen blueberries, 20 percent of celery, and 25 percent of strawberries contained traces of one type of organophosphate. Other types of organophosphates were found in 27 percent of green beans, 17 percent of peaches, and 8 percent of broccoli.

Although kids should not stop eating fruits and vegetables, buying organic or local produce whenever possible is a good idea, says Bouchard.

“Organic fruits and vegetables contain much less pesticides, so I would certainly advise getting those for children,” she says. “National surveys have also shown that fruits and vegetables from farmers’ markets contain less pesticides even if they’re not organic. If you can buy local and from farmers’ markets, that’s a good way to go.”

A direct cause-and-effect link between pesticides and ADHD “is really hard to establish,” says Dana Boyd Barr, Ph.D., a professor of environmental and occupational health at Emory University. However, she says, “There appears to be some relation between organophosphate pesticide exposure and the development of ADHD.”

This is the largest study of its kind to date, according to Barr, who researched pesticides for more than 20 years in her previous job with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention but was not involved in the study.

Bouchard and her colleagues analyzed urine samples from children ages 8 to 15. The samples were collected during an annual, nationwide survey conducted by the CDC, known as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

The researchers tested the samples for six chemical byproducts (known as metabolites) that result when the body breaks down more than 28 different pesticides. Nearly 95 percent of the children had at least one byproduct detected in their urine.

Just over 10 percent of the children in the study were diagnosed with ADHD. The kids were judged to have ADHD if their symptoms (as reported by parents) met established criteria for the disorder, or if they had taken ADHD medication regularly in the previous year.

One group of pesticide byproducts was associated with a substantially increased risk of ADHD. Compared with kids who had the lowest levels, the kids whose levels were 10 times higher were 55 percent more likely to have ADHD. (Another group of byproducts did not appear to be linked to the disorder.)

In addition, children with higher-than-average levels of the most commonly detected byproduct — found in roughly 6 in 10 kids — were nearly twice as likely to have ADHD.

“It’s not a small effect,” says Bouchard. “This is 100 percent more risk.”

To isolate the effect of the pesticide exposure on ADHD symptoms, the researchers controlled for a variety of health and demographic factors that could have skewed the results.

Still, the study had some limitations and is not definitive, Bouchard says. Most notably, she and her colleagues measured only one urine sample for each child, and therefore weren’t able to track whether the levels of pesticide byproducts were constant, or whether the association between exposure and ADHD changed over time.

Long-term studies including multiple urine samples from the same children are needed, Bouchard says. She suspects such studies would show an even stronger link between pesticide byproducts and ADHD.

EPA spokesman Dale Kemery said in a statement that the agency routinely reviews the safety of all pesticides, including organophosphates. “We are currently developing a framework to incorporate data from studies similar to this one into our risk assessment,” Kemery said. “We will look at this study and use the framework to decide how it fits into our overall risk assessment.”

Kemery recommended that parents try other pest-control tactics before resorting to pesticide use in the home or garden. Washing and peeling fruits and vegetables and eating “a varied diet” will also help reduce potential exposure to pesticides, he said.

“I would hope that this study raises awareness as to the risk associated with pesticide exposure,” Bouchard says. “There’s really only a handful of studies on this subject out there, so there’s room for more awareness.”

Source: CNN

Factory Farming Fish FAIL

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Chile’s loss is Norway’s gain. After a virus that causes salmon anemia devastated Chile’s salmon harvest, prices have spiked worldwide and Norway’s salmon exporters are taking advantage. Chile had been the second biggest producer of salmon in the world, but is predicted to sell only about 90,000 tons this year, compared to 403,000 tons in 2008.

BusinessWeek has a recent story and so does the Financial Times. The Financial Times includes a single line speculating as to the cause of the virus outbreak:

Environmental groups accuse Chile’s salmon industry of over-crowding its cages for salmon and using too many chemicals.

But what neither report tells us is that 20 years ago, Chile had no salmon industry at all. Salmon are not indigenous to South America. Chile’s entire production was farmed, and for years, a hefty proportion of the harvest went directly to Wal-Mart. As Wal-Mart expanded its grocery offerings, so did Chile’s salmon farms burgeon.

In 2006, Salon excerpted a chapter from Charles Fishman’s excellent “The Wal-Mart Effect” that told the story of Chilean salmon. After learning of the Chilean salmon disaster from the International Political Economy Zone blog, I went back to review that chapter, and the following paragraph jumped out at me.

Salmon farming is starting to transform the ecology and environment of southern Chile too, with tens of millions of salmon living in vast ocean corrals, their excess food and feces settling to the ocean floor beneath the pens, and dozens of salmon processing plants dumping untreated salmon entrails directly into the ocean.

Who could have predicted that the mass forced farming of an exotic fish to please the Wal-Mart low-price palate would result in a horrific virus-borne plague of anemia?

Back to Fishman:

“Have you ever seen a hog farm?” asks Gerry Leape, vice president of marine conservation for the National Environmental Trust, a Washington-based environmental nonprofit group. “These fish are the hogs of the sea. They live in the same sort of conditions, it’s just in water. They pack them really closely together, they use a lot of prophylactic antibiotics, not to treat disease, but to prevent it. There’s lots of concentrated fish waste, it creates dead zones in the ocean around the pens.”

(Wal-Mart, incidentally, stopped buying Chilean salmon in July.) The Chilean government is now working on new laws to govern salmon farming  designed to ensure healthier fish, but in the meantime the whole sorry saga offers a potent metaphor for the dangers inherent in any kind of industrial production of animals.

Source: Chile’s farmed salmon disaster (Salon)

See also: Chile’s Antibiotics Use on Salmon Farms Dwarfs That of a Top Rival’s (NY Times)

Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria in The Meat? We’re Gonna Find Out

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Researchers in Flagstaff are looking at what happens when farmers routinely feed antibiotics to the beef, chicken, pork, turkey, shrimp and salmon you might find at the local grocery store.

They’re buying meat and seafood from grocery stores here and in Los Angeles, Florida, Chicago, and the District of Columbia, to investigate what kinds of bacteria live on it.

If past testing for different bacteria is any indication, they could find some ugly stuff: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria capable of infecting you by kitchen cross-contamination, even if you’re a vegetarian living with omnivores.

“We think that it is contributing significantly to the antibiotic resistance problem in people,” said Lance B. Price, a biologist and director of a Translational Genomics (TGen) North unit that does research bearing on human health and the organisms living on us.

Animals in many commercial feeding operations in the United States — Europe, including the world’s top pork producer, Denmark, has banned the practice — feed their animals antibiotics routinely when they are well, sometimes mixed with food, to help them grow faster and remain healthy in crowded conditions.

“In industrial food animal production, one of their standard tools is to use antibiotics,” Price said.

Click to continue »

Target Throws Back Farmed Salmon

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Target has announced that all their stores will stop selling farmed salmon products. This move towards greater ocean conservation is a first by a major seafood retailer. Salmon consumption in the United States is a huge market for retailers. Salmon is second only to shrimp in seafood purchases in the United States. This announcement is sure to have a ripple affect across the entire seafood industry and will improve the health of oceans throughout the world.

Target will replace farmed salmon with wild Alaskan salmon, a relatively healthy and sustainable product. This transition affects all sections of the store – frozen, fresh, smoked, and shelf-stable farmed salmon products have all been replaced by more environmentally sound alternatives.  Greenpeace applauds Target’s decision to address ocean conservation and provide leadership to other seafood retailers who want to follow in their footsteps.

Next Stop: Trader Joes

Visit Greenpeace’s Trader Joes SUstainable Fisheries Campaign at www.traitorjoe.com

Target discontinues the sale of farmed salmon (Greenpeace)

Scientists Turn Stem Cells into Pork

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Dutch scientists have been successful in creating pork meat in a lab from the stem cells of pigs.

Reports state that the lab grown meat does not yet resemble or taste much like pork (it has the consistency of a scallop), the results could prove to be a major landmark in the world’s food supply.

“If we took the stem cells from one pig and multiplied it by a factor of a million, we would need one million fewer pigs to get the same amount of meat,” said Mark Post, a biologist at Maastricht University involved in the project.

Slaughterhouses could be a thing of the past

This could mean that slaughterhouses in the future will no longer be needed. Global warming could be lowered by up to 95%, world hunger tackled - a green alternative may be possible.

Concerns

Although there seem to be positive future aspects, there are also concerns regarding meat grown in a lab. Some health experts are concerned about dangers to human health.  Also, less dependency in livestock could affect the agricultural ecosystems.

“Part of our enjoyment of eating meat depends on the very complicated muscle and fat structure… whether that can be replicated is still a question,”  - biochemist Peter Ellis.

However, the researchers who are involved in the project believe that the benefits of the technology surpass the risks.

Use Coal Waste on Fields say US Officials

Monday, January 18th, 2010

The U.S. government is encouraging farmers to spread a chalky waste from coal-fired power plants on their fields to loosen and fertilize soil.

The material is produced by power plant “scrubbers” that remove acid-rain-causing sulfur dioxide from plant emissions.

The substance is a synthetic form of the mineral gypsum, and it also contains mercury, arsenic, lead and other heavy metals.

The synthetic gypsum — a whitish, calcium-rich material is known as flue gas desulfurization gypsum, or FGD gypsum. The Obama administration has continued promoting FGD gypsum’s use in farming.

The Environmental Protection Agency says toxic metals occur in tiny amounts. Some environmentalists say too little is known about how the material affects crops, and ultimately human health.

U.S. wants farmers to use coal waste on fields (Washington Post)

Why Haven’t Fruit & Vegetable Eaters Been Told About This Toxic Waste Overload? (Mercola.com)

Spent Laying Hens Fed to Schoolkids

Monday, December 21st, 2009

The meat is stringier, tougher and generally speaking less appealing than the tender meat we have come to expect from conventional broiler chickens.  That hasn’t stopped the USDA from using the National School Lunch Program to get rid of some of the 100 million egg-laying hens culled each year.

The egg industry needs to find new markets to “dispose” of spent hens as more mainstream customers drop off because of the notoriously low quality. The primary options include pet food, cattle feed, composting  — and schools.

Meat that is no longer good enough for KFC and Campbell Soup is being fed to our children, hidden in salads and chicken “burgers”.

Because the hens from the egg factories are often restricted to tiny cages, stacked from floor to ceiling, they are exposed to high levels of fecal dust and subject to heavy stress. This may account for the higher levels of salmonella infection and osteoporosis which leads to bone splinters in their meat.

USDA Allows Meat In Schools that Doesn’t Meet Fast Food Chains’ Standards (Huffington Post)

Fast-food safety rules trump those for school lunches (USA Today)